- 14001 N. 7th Street, Suite B104, Phoenix, Arizona 85022
- Available 24/7
- 602-926-7373
Defense against federal wire fraud charges under 18 U.S.C. § 1343 – the most commonly
charged federal fraud offense in the District of Arizona.
30+ Years Federal Defense
Federal agents are asking questions about emails you sent or money transfers you made. Wire fraud is the government’s favorite charge because it’s so broad. Any email, phone call or electronic transfer connected to an alleged scheme can become a separate federal count. That means what might seem like one situation to you looks like 20 or 30 counts to a prosecutor. Each count carries up to 20 years. The math is terrifying on purpose.
I’ve spent over 30 years fighting wire fraud charges in Arizona federal court. I know how prosecutors stack these counts to pressure people into plea deals. I also know how to challenge their theories and get counts dismissed. Let me look at your situation before you talk to anyone else.
The federal wire fraud statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1343, makes it a federal crime to devise or participate in a scheme to defraud another person of money or property using interstate wire communications.
To secure a conviction for wire fraud, the federal government must prove four essential elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
**The Scheme to Defraud**: The defendant voluntarily and intentionally devised or participated in a scheme to defraud another out of money, property or honest services.
**Intent to Defraud**: The defendant acted with the specific intent to defraud. This
means they acted knowingly and with the intention to deceive or cheat.
**Materiality**: The scheme involved material misstatements, misrepresentations or omissions. A statement is material if it has a natural tendency to influence, or is capable of influencing, the decision of the person to whom it was addressed.
The scope of federal fraud statutes is frequently litigated. In recent years, the Supreme Court has clarified that the wire fraud statute requires the government to prove that the object of the fraud was money or property, not merely the deprivation of accurate information. Additionally, the "honest services" fraud provision (18 U.S.C. § 1346), which is often charged in conjunction with wire fraud, has been narrowed to apply only to bribery and kickback schemes, not mere conflicts of interest.
The Department of Justice considers white-collar crime and corporate fraud to be top priorities. The DOJ's Criminal Division Fraud Section has reported record-setting years in recent enforcement actions.
Health Care Fraud**: The DOJ continues to aggressively pursue health care fraud, often utilizing the wire fraud statute. Recent national takedowns have targeted telemedicine schemes, prescription drug abuse, and fraudulent billing practices.
Pandemic Relief Fraud**: The DOJ established the COVID-19 Fraud Enforcement Task Force to prosecute fraud related to the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP), Economic Injury Disaster Loans (EIDL), and unemployment insurance. These cases almost universally include wire fraud charges.
Cryptocurrency and Cyber Fraud**: The National Cryptocurrency Enforcement Team (NCET) focuses on crimes involving digital assets, including investment scams and money laundering, which rely heavily on interstate wire communications.
Trade Fraud**: The newly established cross-agency Trade Fraud Task Force targets tariff evasion and customs fraud.
The District of Arizona, with federal courthouses in Phoenix and Tucson, has unique characteristics regarding federal prosecutions.
The U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Arizona actively prosecutes wire fraud, particularly in areas that impact the local economy and vulnerable populations.
Healthcare Fraud Hotspot**: Federal prosecutors have identified Arizona as a high-risk state for healthcare fraud. Recent enforcement actions have targeted fraudulent billing by behavioral health facilities and sober living homes in the Phoenix area.
Real Estate and Mortgage Fraud**: Given Arizona's dynamic real estate market, mortgage fraud and real estate investment schemes remain a priority for local federal prosecutors.
Border-Related Financial Crimes**: The Tucson division frequently handles wire fraud cases that intersect with transnational criminal organizations, including money laundering and smuggling operations that utilize wire transfers.
Federal wire fraud investigations are thorough, well-funded, and can last for months or even years before charges are filed.
Multiple federal agencies investigate wire fraud, often working together on joint task forces:
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)**: The primary agency for investigating complex financial crimes, corporate fraud, and cyber fraud.
Internal Revenue Service - Criminal Investigation (IRS-CI)**: Focuses on the financial aspects of the fraud, tracing the flow of illicit funds and investigating related tax evasion or money laundering.
Other Agencies**: Depending on the nature of the fraud, agencies like the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), Homeland Security Investigations (HSI), or the Secret Service may be involved.
**Trigger**: Investigations are often triggered by whistleblower complaints, suspicious activity reports (SARs) filed by banks, regulatory agency referrals, or data analytics used by the DOJ to identify anomalous billing patterns.
**Covert Phase**: Agents gather evidence quietly through subpoenas for bank records, email warrants, wiretaps and interviews with cooperating witnesses or confidential informants.
**Overt Phase**: The investigation becomes public when agents execute search warrants at homes or businesses, issue grand jury subpoenas for documents, or conduct surprise "knock and talk" interviews with targets or subjects.
Wire fraud is a versatile charge applied to a wide variety of scenarios. Common fact patterns in Arizona include:
Investment Fraud (Ponzi Schemes)**: Promising high returns on fake investments in real estate, cryptocurrency or foreign exchange markets, and using new investors' money to pay off earlier investors.
PPP and EIDL Loan Fraud**: Submitting false applications with inflated payroll numbers or fake tax documents to obtain federal pandemic relief funds.
Healthcare Billing Fraud**: Clinics or doctors billing Medicare or private insurance for services not rendered, upcoding procedures, or paying kickbacks for patient referrals.
Business Email Compromise (BEC)**: Hacking into corporate email accounts to trick employees into wiring funds to fraudulent accounts.
Telemarketing Fraud**: Operating boiler rooms that target the elderly with fake lottery winnings, tech support scams, or fraudulent charitable solicitations.
Defending against federal wire fraud charges requires a proactive and strategic approach. Experienced federal defense attorneys employ several key strategies:
The most common and effective defense is that the defendant acted in good faith and lacked the specific intent to defraud. If the defendant genuinely believed the representations they made were true, even if they were ultimately false or the business failed, they cannot be convicted of wire fraud. Poor business judgment or mismanagement is not a federal crime.
The defense can argue that the alleged misrepresentations were not material. If the false statements would not have influenced a reasonable person's decision to part with their money or property, the materiality element is not met.
The general statute of limitations for wire fraud is five years. However, if the fraud affects a financial institution, the statute of limitations is extended to ten years. Defense attorneys carefully analyze the timeline to ensure charges are not based on conduct outside the permissible window.
If federal agents violated the defendant's Fourth Amendment rights by conducting an illegal search or seizure, or their Fifth Amendment rights during an interrogation, the defense can file a motion to suppress the evidence. If successful, the government may be forced to dismiss the case.
A federal wire fraud conviction carries devastating consequences that extend far beyond a prison sentence.
Restitution**: The court will order the defendant to pay full restitution to the victims of the fraud. This obligation cannot be discharged in bankruptcy.
Asset Forfeiture**: The government will seize any assets derived from the proceeds of the fraud, including homes, vehicles, bank accounts, and investments.
Professional Licenses**: A felony fraud conviction will almost certainly result in the revocation of professional licenses (e.g., law, medicine, real estate, CPA, securities broker).
Immigration Consequences**: Wire fraud is considered a Crime Involving Moral Turpitude (CIMT) and an Aggravated Felony under immigration law, leading to mandatory deportation for non-citizens.
Supervised Release**: After serving a prison sentence, defendants face up to three years of supervised release, with strict conditions regarding employment, travel and financial disclosures.
A: The elements are nearly identical. The only difference is the medium used to execute the scheme. Mail fraud involves the use of the U.S. Postal Service or private interstate carriers (like FedEx or UPS), while wire fraud involves electronic communications (internet, phone, email, wire transfers).
A: Yes. The federal wire fraud statute punishes the *scheme* to defraud, not just the successful execution of it. You can be convicted even if no one actually lost money, as long as the government proves you intended to defraud them.
A: You should politely decline to answer any questions and immediately state that you want to speak with an attorney. Do not lie to federal agents, as that is a separate federal crime (18 U.S.C. § 1001). Contact an experienced federal criminal defense lawyer immediately.
A: Yes, the communication must cross state or international borders to satisfy the “interstate commerce” requirement. However, because internet traffic and cellular signals routinely cross state lines even for local communications, this element is usually easy for the government to prove.
A: Yes. Under the doctrine of *respondeat superior*, a corporation can be held criminally liable for the illegal acts of its employees or agents if those acts were committed within the scope of their employment and intended, at least in part, to benefit the corporation.
A: The judge will calculate your advisory sentencing range under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, primarily based on the financial loss amount. However, the guidelines are advisory, and your attorney can present mitigating factors (such as your background, lack of criminal history, or minor role in the offense) to argue for a downward variance and a lighter sentence. *** *Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. If you are facing federal criminal charges, you should consult with an experienced federal criminal defense attorney immediately.*
Facing federal charges? Call now for a free, confidential consultation with an experienced federal defense attorney who has handled these cases for over 30 years.
Available 24/7 — Nights & Weekends
30+ Years Federal Defense Experience
U.S. Army Veteran (82nd Airborne)
Time is critical in federal cases. Contact us immediately for a free consultation to discuss
your defense options.
Available 24/7 – Free consultation for all federal criminal matters
This site is for informational purposes only. Not legal advice.
Website crafted by Minnesota Legal Website Design & SEO
