- 14001 N. 7th Street, Suite B104, Phoenix, Arizona 85022
- Available 24/7
- 602-926-7373
Defense against federal Ponzi scheme, investment fraud and securities fraud charges in the
District of Arizona.
30+ Years Federal Defense
Investors are calling you a fraud and now the FBI and SEC are investigating your business. Investment fraud cases are some of the most complex in federal court. The government will hire forensic accountants to trace every dollar and they’ll interview every investor who lost money. The loss amount drives your sentence and prosecutors will calculate it in the way that hurts you most.
I’ve defended investment fraud and Ponzi scheme cases involving millions of dollars. I know how to challenge the government’s loss calculations and I know how to present mitigating evidence that can dramatically reduce your exposure. These cases are winnable but you need someone who understands the financial complexity.
Federal prosecutors have a wide array of statutes at their disposal to charge individuals involved in Ponzi schemes and investment fraud. The most common charges include Securities Fraud, Wire Fraud, and Mail Fraud.
Enacted as part of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1348 makes it a federal crime to knowingly execute, or attempt to execute, a scheme or artifice to defraud any person in connection with any security, or to obtain money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations or promises in connection with the purchase or sale of any security [1].
The defendant knowingly executed or attempted to execute a scheme or artifice to defraud, or to obtain money or property by materially false or fraudulent pretenses.
The scheme was in connection with a security.
The defendant acted with the intent to defraud.
This statute prohibits the use of any manipulative or deceptive device in connection with the purchase or sale of any security.
The Federal Sentencing Guidelines for economic crimes, including Ponzi schemes, are notoriously harsh. The primary guideline applicable to these offenses is **§2B1.1 (Larceny, Embezzlement and Other Forms of Theft; Offenses Involving Stolen Property; Property Damage or Destruction; Fraud and Deceit)**.
The base offense level for fraud is typically 6 or 7. However, the most significant driver of the sentence is the "loss amount." In Ponzi schemes, the loss amount is often calculated based on the total amount of money invested by victims, minus any money returned to them before the scheme collapsed. Because Ponzi schemes often involve millions of dollars, the loss amount can add 20 to 30 points or more to the offense level [3].
Several specific offense characteristics can further increase the offense level:
While the statutes themselves may not have mandatory minimums, the sheer volume of the loss and the number of victims often push the advisory guideline range to the statutory maximums. For example, a loss of over $25 million with more than 50 victims can easily result in a guideline range of 20 years or more.
The Department of Justice (DOJ) has made the prosecution of complex financial frauds, including Ponzi schemes, a top priority. The DOJ's Fraud Section frequently coordinates with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the FBI, and the IRS Criminal Investigation Division (IRS-CI) to dismantle these operations.
Recent trends indicate a focus on:
The District of Arizona, encompassing both the Phoenix and Tucson divisions, has seen its share of high-profile Ponzi scheme prosecutions. The U.S. Attorney's Office in Arizona is particularly vigilant regarding "affinity fraud"—schemes that target members of specific religious or community groups.
Federal investigations into Ponzi schemes are exhaustive and can last for years before an indictment is unsealed.
Investigations are often triggered by:
Whistleblower complaints to the SEC or DOJ.
Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs) filed by banks.
Complaints from investors who have stopped receiving promised returns or are unable to withdraw their funds.
Routine audits or regulatory examinations.
Ponzi schemes often share common characteristics:
Affinity Targeting: Exploiting trust within a specific community, such as a church, ethnic group, or professional association.
Defending against federal Ponzi scheme charges requires a sophisticated approach, often involving forensic accountants and extensive document review.
The core of many fraud charges is the intent to deceive. If the defense can demonstrate that the defendant genuinely believed in the viability of the investment strategy and did not intend to defraud investors, it can negate the mens rea requirement. A failed business is not inherently a fraud.
In complex organizations, not everyone is aware of the fraudulent nature of the operation. Salespeople, administrative staff, and even some executives may have believed the investments were legitimate. Proving that a defendant lacked knowledge of the scheme is a strong defense.
Because the loss amount dictates the severity of the sentence, challenging the government's calculation is crucial. Defense forensic accountants can argue that certain funds were legitimately invested or that the value of remaining assets should offset the loss amount.
Federal fraud charges generally have a five-year statute of limitations. The defense can argue that the alleged fraudulent acts occurred outside this window, although prosecutors often use the "continuing offense" doctrine to extend the timeframe.
A conviction for a federal Ponzi scheme carries devastating collateral consequences:
A: A legitimate investment involves deploying capital into actual assets or businesses with the expectation of a return, acknowledging the risk of loss. A Ponzi scheme uses funds from new investors to pay “returns” to earlier investors, creating the illusion of profitability without any underlying legitimate investment activity.
A: Federal fraud statutes require the government to prove that you acted with the intent to defraud. If you were an employee or salesperson who genuinely believed the investment was legitimate and had no knowledge of the fraudulent structure, you have a strong “lack of knowledge” defense.
A: The loss amount is generally calculated as the total amount of money invested by the victims minus any money that was returned to them before the scheme was exposed. This net loss figure is used to determine the severity of the sentence under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines.
A: Yes. Federal courts mandate restitution to the victims of the fraud. Additionally, the government will pursue asset forfeiture, seizing any property or funds that were acquired using the proceeds of the scheme.
A: Do not speak to federal agents without an attorney present. Anything you say can be used against you. Contact an experienced federal criminal defense attorney immediately to protect your rights and navigate the investigation.
A: Yes. It is very common for the SEC to conduct a civil investigation while the DOJ conducts a parallel criminal investigation. Information gathered by the SEC can often be shared with criminal prosecutors, making it critical to have coordinated legal representation. — ### References [1] 18 U.S. Code § 1348 – Securities and commodities fraud. Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School. [2] Federal Ponzi Scheme Defense: Investment Fraud Cases. Spodek Law Group. [3] U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual §2B1.1. United States Sentencing Commission. [4] Mathon Principals Sentenced To Lengthy Prison Terms For Operating $166 Million Ponzi Scheme That Targeted Lds Church Members. U.S. Attorney’s Office, District of Arizona. [5] Arizona Man Sentenced to More than Seven Years for Defrauding 54 Victims in Investment Fraud Scheme. U.S. Attorney’s Office, District of Arizona.
Facing federal charges? Call now for a free, confidential consultation with an experienced federal defense attorney who has handled these cases for over 30 years.
Available 24/7 — Nights & Weekends
30+ Years Federal Defense Experience
U.S. Army Veteran (82nd Airborne)
Time is critical when facing federal charges. Every day without experienced counsel is a
day the government uses to build its case against you. Contact Myles A. Schneider today
for a free, confidential consultation.
Available 24/7 – Free consultation for all federal criminal matters
This site is for informational purposes only. Not legal advice.
Website crafted by Minnesota Legal Website Design & SEO
