Business Fraud Defense

Defense against federal white collar business fraud charges including securities fraud,
corporate fraud, tax evasion and accounting fraud.

Myles A. Schneider

30+ Years Federal Defense

Facing Business Fraud Charges? We Can Help.

Federal agents are investigating your business and you don’t know what they’re looking for or how far this goes. White collar business fraud investigations can go on for months or years before charges are filed. During that time the government is building their case while you’re in the dark. They’re subpoenaing your records, interviewing your employees and constructing a narrative that makes everything look intentional.

I step in during investigations before charges are filed whenever possible. Getting involved early means I can shape the narrative, protect your rights during interviews and sometimes prevent charges from ever being brought. If you’ve already been indicted I know how to dismantle the government’s case piece by piece.

Federal Statute Details: The Law on Business Fraud

Federal business fraud is not a single crime but a category of offenses prosecuted under various federal statutes. The most common statutes used to prosecute corporate fraud include Mail Fraud, Wire Fraud, and Bank Fraud.

Wire fraud is one of the most frequently charged federal crimes because of its broad application. It involves any scheme to defraud that uses interstate wire communications (such as emails, phone calls, or internet transfers).

Elements the Government Must Prove: To secure a conviction for wire fraud, federal prosecutors must prove beyond a reasonable doubt:

The defendant voluntarily and intentionally devised or participated in a scheme to defraud another out of money or property.

The defendant did so with the intent to defraud.

It was reasonably foreseeable that interstate wire communications would be used.

Interstate wire communications were in fact used in furtherance of the scheme.

Recent Interpretations: Recent Supreme Court decisions have narrowed the scope of what constitutes “property” under the wire fraud statute, emphasizing that the statute protects traditional property rights rather than intangible rights to honest services (unless bribery or kickbacks are involved).
 

Federal Sentencing Guidelines for Corporate Fraud

Federal sentencing for business and corporate fraud is primarily governed by Section 2B1.1 of the United States Sentencing Guidelines (USSG). The guidelines are complex and heavily driven by the financial loss associated with the fraud.

Under USSG § 2B1.1, the base offense level for most fraud offenses is 6. If the applicable statutory maximum sentence is 20 years or more (which is the case for wire fraud and mail fraud), the base offense level is 7.

The most significant factor in determining the final offense level is the “loss amount.” The guidelines provide for substantial increases in the offense level based on the intended or actual financial loss caused by the fraud.

Loss Amount: The offense level increases incrementally based on the loss amount. For example, a loss of more than $6,500 adds 2 levels, while a loss of more than $550 million adds 30 levels.
Number of Victims: If the offense involved 10 or more victims, the offense level increases by 2. If it involved 50 or more victims, it increases by 4.
Sophisticated Means: If the offense involved sophisticated means (e.g., hiding assets or transactions through the use of fictitious entities or offshore accounts), the offense level increases by 2.
Abuse of Position of Trust: If the defendant abused a position of public or private trust, or used a special skill, in a manner that significantly facilitated the commission or concealment of the offense, the offense level increases by 2.

While most fraud statutes do not carry mandatory minimum sentences, certain related charges, such as Aggravated Identity Theft (18 U.S.C. § 1028A), carry a mandatory consecutive two-year prison sentence.

 

DOJ Enforcement Trends and Priorities

The Department of Justice (DOJ) has recently intensified its focus on corporate and white-collar crime.

Corporate Accountability: The DOJ has emphasized holding individual executives accountable for corporate misconduct. The “Monaco Memo” outlined policies requiring companies to disclose all relevant facts about individual misconduct to receive cooperation credit.
Data-Driven Prosecutions: The DOJ’s Fraud Section increasingly relies on data analytics to identify anomalies and patterns indicative of fraud, particularly in healthcare and financial sectors.
Strike Forces: The DOJ has expanded its Strike Force model, which brings together prosecutors and investigators from various agencies to target specific types of fraud, such as healthcare fraud and pandemic relief fraud (e.g., PPP loan fraud).

In recent years, the DOJ’s Fraud Section has reported record numbers of enforcement actions and convictions, with aggregate estimated fraud losses in the billions of dollars. The focus on pandemic-related fraud has led to hundreds of prosecutions nationwide.

 

District of Arizona Specifics

The District of Arizona, with divisions in Phoenix and Tucson, has its own unique enforcement landscape.

The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Arizona has prioritized the prosecution of complex financial crimes, healthcare fraud, and investment fraud. Arizona’s growing population and significant retiree demographic make it a target for investment schemes and healthcare fraud.

Healthcare Fraud: Arizona has been identified as a high-risk state for healthcare fraud. The DOJ recently launched a West Coast Strike Force that includes the District of Arizona to target healthcare fraud schemes.
Pandemic Relief Fraud: The District of Arizona has actively prosecuted individuals and businesses for fraudulently obtaining Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loans and Economic Injury Disaster Loans (EIDL).
Investment Fraud: Cases involving real estate investment schemes and cryptocurrency fraud have been prominent in the Phoenix division.
 

The Federal Investigation Process

Federal investigations into business fraud are typically lengthy, secretive and resource-intensive.

Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI): The lead agency for investigating corporate fraud, focusing on accounting schemes, self-dealing, and complex financial crimes.
Internal Revenue Service – Criminal Investigation (IRS-CI): Specializes in tax evasion, money laundering, and financial schemes that violate federal tax laws.
Homeland Security Investigations (HSI): Often involved in cases with international components, such as cross-border wire fraud or trade-based money laundering.
Other Agencies: The SEC, Postal Inspection Service, and Office of Inspector General (OIG) for various departments (e.g., HHS-OIG for healthcare fraud) also play critical roles.

Investigations can be triggered by whistleblowers, regulatory audits, suspicious activity reports (SARs) filed by banks, or data analytics used by the DOJ. These investigations often last for months or even years before any charges are filed.

Federal agents use powerful tools to gather evidence, including:

Grand Jury Subpoenas: Used to compel the production of documents (emails, financial records, corporate documents) and witness testimony.
 

Common Fact Patterns in Corporate Fraud

Corporate fraud charges often arise from specific, recurring scenarios.

Accounting Fraud: Manipulating financial statements to inflate revenues, hide liabilities, or meet earnings expectations. This often involves executives or accounting personnel.
Embezzlement and Misappropriation: Executives or employees diverting corporate funds for personal use through fake vendors, inflated expenses, or unauthorized transfers.
Investment Fraud (Ponzi Schemes): Promising high returns to investors and using funds from new investors to pay earlier investors, while siphoning off money for personal use.
Procurement Fraud: Overbilling the government or submitting false claims for services not rendered, often seen in defense contracting or healthcare.
Pandemic Relief Fraud: Submitting false applications for PPP loans or misusing the funds for unauthorized purposes.

Charges are typically brought against C-suite executives (CEOs, CFOs), business owners, accountants and financial advisors. These individuals are often well-educated professionals with no prior criminal history.

 

Defense Strategies for Federal Business Fraud

Defending against federal corporate fraud charges requires a proactive and sophisticated approach.

Lack of Intent (Good Faith Defense): The most common defense in fraud cases is that the defendant acted in good faith and did not have the specific intent to defraud. Mistakes, poor business judgment, or reliance on the advice of professionals (like accountants or lawyers) can negate criminal intent.
Materiality: The false statements or misrepresentations must be “material” (capable of influencing the victim’s decision). If the misrepresentation was minor or irrelevant, it may not constitute fraud.
Statute of Limitations: Most federal fraud crimes have a five-year statute of limitations. If the government waits too long to bring charges, the case may be dismissed.
Constitutional Violations: Challenging the legality of search warrants, wiretaps or interrogations under the Fourth and Fifth Amendments. If evidence was obtained illegally, it may be suppressed.
Motion to Dismiss: Arguing that the indictment fails to allege a federal crime or is legally defective.
Motion to Suppress: Seeking to exclude evidence obtained in violation of constitutional rights.
Early Intervention: Engaging with prosecutors before charges are filed to present exculpatory evidence and argue against indictment.
 

Consequences Beyond Prison

A conviction for federal business fraud carries severe collateral consequences that extend far beyond a prison sentence.

Asset Forfeiture: The government can seize assets (bank accounts, real estate, vehicles) that are traceable to the proceeds of the fraud.
Restitution: Defendants are typically ordered to repay the victims for their financial losses, which can amount to millions of dollars and result in lifelong debt.
Professional License Loss: Convictions usually result in the revocation of professional licenses (e.g., law, medicine, accounting, real estate).
Debarment: Individuals and companies may be barred from participating in federal programs or securing government contracts.
Immigration Consequences: Non-citizens convicted of fraud may face deportation or denial of naturalization.
Supervised Release: After serving a prison sentence, defendants are subject to years of supervised release, with strict conditions on their employment, travel and financial activities.

A: Federal fraud charges typically involve schemes that cross state lines, use federal systems (like the U.S. Postal Service or interstate wires), or defraud federal agencies or federally insured banks. Federal cases are investigated by agencies like the FBI and prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney’s Office, often carrying harsher penalties and more complex sentencing guidelines than state charges.

 

A: Yes. If that single email was sent in furtherance of a scheme to defraud, it can serve as the basis for a wire fraud charge. The email itself does not need to contain the fraudulent misrepresentation; it only needs to be a step in executing the scheme.

 
 
 

A: You should remain calm, ask to see the warrant, and immediately contact a federal criminal defense attorney. Do not interfere with the search, but do not answer any substantive questions or volunteer information. You have the right to remain silent and the right to an attorney.

A: The loss amount is generally the greater of the actual loss (the reasonably foreseeable pecuniary harm that resulted from the offense) or the intended loss (the pecuniary harm that the defendant purposely sought to inflict). This calculation is often highly contested and requires expert financial analysis.

 
 
 

A: While difficult, it is possible in some cases. The outcome depends on factors such as the loss amount, the defendant’s role in the offense, their criminal history, and whether they cooperated with the government. An experienced attorney can advocate for a downward departure or variance from the sentencing guidelines to secure probation or a reduced sentence.

 
 
 

A: A target letter is a formal notification from a federal prosecutor informing you that you are the subject of a grand jury investigation and that the government believes you have committed a crime. If you receive a target letter, you should contact an attorney immediately, as an indictment is likely imminent.

 

A: Yes. Under the doctrine of *respondeat superior*, a corporation can be held criminally liable for the illegal acts of its employees or agents if those acts were committed within the scope of their employment and intended, at least in part, to benefit the corporation.

 

Free Consultation

Facing federal charges? Call now for a free, confidential consultation with an experienced federal defense attorney who has handled these cases for over 30 years.

Available 24/7 — Nights & Weekends

Myles A. Schneider

30+ Years Federal Defense Experience

U.S. Army Veteran (82nd Airborne)

Why Choose Our Firm

Get Experienced Federal Defense Now

Time is critical when facing federal charges. Every day without experienced counsel is a
day the government uses to build its case against you. Contact Myles A. Schneider today
for a free, confidential consultation.